- Span
- January – October 1848
- Place
- Paris, Vienna, Berlin, Milan, Budapest, Bucharest
- Form
- Turning point — One chain of events, read in sequence.
- Published
- 2026-09-03
What made it possible
- The 1845–47 European potato failure and the 1846 grain crisis raised food prices across the continent and pushed urban workers into destitution.
- Railways and the telegraph allowed news of the February revolution to reach Vienna, Berlin and Milan within days, synchronising movements that had previously run on separate timetables.
- The 1815 settlements had left national aspirations unsatisfied in Germany, Italy, Hungary and the Balkans while denying most of the middle class any share in government.
- Publishing restrictions had loosened just enough in the 1840s for a politically literate public to form around newspapers and pamphlets.
Who acted
- Alexis de Tocqueville
- Predicted the February revolution in a speech on 29 January 1848 and then served the Second Republic
- Metternich
- Austrian chancellor for twenty-seven years; resigned and fled Vienna on 13 March
- Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte
- Elected president of the Second Republic in December 1848 by a landslide, then made himself emperor in 1851–52
- Lajos Kossuth
- Led the Hungarian diet's demand for responsible government; the resulting war was crushed with Russian help in 1849
The speed was a railway effect
The revolutions spread faster than any previous European upheaval because the news could travel by wire and rail. Vienna learned of Paris within days; Berlin learned from Vienna; Milan and Budapest learned from both. There was also a peasant dimension: emancipation decrees issued in March and April were often read aloud at markets, and rural crowds forced landlords to concede before the cities had finished arguing.
This synchronisation is what gave 1848 its reputation as a springtime. It was also what made it fragile: the revolutionaries assumed they were part of one movement, then discovered that their programmes contradicted each other as soon as the common enemy had been replaced by an elected assembly.
The Frankfurt Assembly's real trap
The Frankfurt parliament, which met from May 1848, had no army, no treasury and no civil service. It could pass resolutions and appoint a fleet, and it did both, but it could not collect a tax or give an order to a soldier. Its central error was to legislate for a Germany that did not yet exist under a monarch who had not agreed to be bound.
When the Prussian king Frederick William IV was offered the imperial crown by a parliamentary delegation in April 1849, he refused it, on the grounds that a crown offered by the people's representatives rather than by the princes was not a crown he could wear. The assembly then had no mechanism except its own dissolution.
- May 1848: the Assembly convenes in St Paul's Church, Frankfurt.
- March 1849: the constitution is adopted; the crown is offered to Frederick William IV.
- April 1849: the king refuses it publicly, calling it a 'crown from the gutter'.
- June 1849: the remaining deputies are dispersed from Stuttgart by Prussian troops.
What survived the counter-revolution
Two irreversible changes came out of the year. The first was peasant emancipation in Austria and Prussia, which destroyed the legal basis of seigneurial labour and created both a free labour market and a class of politically engaged smallholders. The second was the political education of the German and Italian burgher classes: they learned that a constitution without control of the army and the bureaucracy was a piece of paper with a printing date.
That lesson produced the 1860s. Cavour in Piedmont built a state apparatus before moving on Italy; Bismarck in Prussia collected taxes and reformed the army before he asked the parliament for anything. The national states that emerged later were the ones 1848 had failed to be.
Consequence: short and long
Immediately
Serfdom was abolished in the Habsburg lands and Prussia, France adopted universal male suffrage for a year, and every other concession was reversed by 1851.
Over the long run
The political defeat was near total, but the social settlement survived. Peasant emancipation in the Habsburg monarchy in 1848 was never reversed, and it created the free smallholding class that Austrian and Hungarian politics spent the next half century courting. In Germany and Italy, the memory of a liberal parliament humiliated by its own lack of power pushed the national question toward the state-building solutions of the 1860s: not 'unity with liberty' but unity delivered by Prussia and Piedmont.
The usual misconception
That 1848 failed because the revolutionaries were romantics with no plan. The deeper problem was that each movement wanted a different state: German liberals in Prague wanted to be part of a German empire, Czech delegates wanted a federal Austria, and Vienna wanted neither. The revolution was defeated partly by its opponents and partly by a coalition that could not agree what it was for.
Sources
- Christopher Clark, The Sleepwalkers (2012) — Opening chapters trace how 1848 reshaped the German state system.
- Jonathan Sperber, The European Revolutions, 1848–1851 (2nd edn, 2005) — Comparative treatment of all the movements, including the Italian and Danubian ones.
- István Deák, The Lawful Revolution: Louis Kossuth and the Hungarians (1979) — On the Hungarian spring and the war of 1848–49.
Canonical: /history/1848-revolutions · 用中文阅读